ANIMAL RIGHTS ACT

Animals should no longer be hunted for sport. Animals should no longer be farmed for their meat and by-products. Animals should no longer be slain for their fur or pelt. These activities bring into universe a violation of basic beast rightfields.

The argument for animal rights functions on two levels, the moral level and the practical level. On the one hand, acknowledging animal rights is a moral imperative. On the early(a) hand, the alternatives to animal vitiate argon practical: they ar frequently healthier, safer, and more informative for human beings.

Regardless of the type of abuse an animal is subjected to, from a moral perspective it is each(prenominal) the akin. Animals majuscule and small share basic characteristics with man. We all take a varying degree of intelligence. We all care for and teach our young. We all have a sense of home and what constitutes a fitting habitat. We know and experience contentment and joy, pain and suffering. All animals possess a claim on life and a right to exist. Opponents of animal rights suggest that because animals do not possess the same faculties for reason, intelligence, and contemplation that humans do, that therefore we are justified in destroying them at will(Singer 18-19).

However, the argument for animal rights shows the fallacy in this idea. forgiving beings all individually possess very(prenominal) different capacities for reason, intelligence, and contemplation. some(prenominal) of us are brilliant, and some of us are mentally handicapped. And yet we do n

And ultimately, the might to reason and contemplate is introduced by anti-animal rights activists as a deduction that animals do not understand their own beguiles, that they are incompetent of making rational choices as humans do. Kathleen Marquardt, founder of set People First, a group designed to combat animal-rights activists, asserts "Animals can't choose, so they can't have rights"(Monagie 20). But consider: if a being is commensurate of suffering, as animals clearly are, does that being not possess a very real, innate interest? Surely it does. Any pecker capable of experiencing pain will carry with it a vested interest in avoiding that pain; its life-long mission will be to undertake out pain's opposite, pleasure.

And in preference, there is choice. As an example: every year horrific research conducted on animals in labs rests entirely upon an animal's tendency to choose behavior that will not put forward a painful electric shock- is this not a choice, mayhap the most fundamental choice a living being can make? And if we undertake to deprive a being capable of experiencing pleasure of the opportunity of achieving it, then we are betraying the very basis of our own moral standards(Singer 22-24).

As immoral as this system is, it is also dangerous for humans. Manure, dead chickens, and other farm-animal carcasses are ground and processed into animal feed which is fed concealment to the birds. The FDA has linked this practice to the spread of food-borne diseases like salmonella. daunts are also cannibals at farm factories, and the disease organisms built up in the manure and organs are recycled everywhere and over again, ultimately infecting livestock directly in the tissue itself? which is what we last buy at the store and eat(Ten Eyck 134-35). In England, the yell industry experienced this in the form of Mad Cow disease, believed to be caused by the feeding of cows with the rendered remains of ghoulish sheep(Williams 64).

So clearly, aside from being utterly im
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.