Sports Instant Replay

Gone were the inept consequence-replay officials, whose indecisiveness resulted in excruciatingly extensive delays. In their place was the referee, who reviewed plays in question using an on-field monitor. And the plays that could be reviewed were limited to three categories: those in the remnant zone, those on the sidelines and all questions regarding the depend of players on the field. clearance coaches toss yellow flags when they want a play reviewed" (Attner 1).

With juvenile technology and an epidemic of despicable officiating, heartbeat replay is at one time again an idea whose time has come. Instant replay was utilize in the NFL from 1986 to 1991, during which time there were reversals on 376 referee calls (Looney 1). The motive for needing technology to help assist in game officiating is simple: the players are human, the coaches are human, and the referees are human. Therefore, human break is always a part of the game and always a part of traditional officiating. When it comes to fan loyalty, coaching passion, and the big bucks a team might lose based on poor officiating, to err might be human but clement is seldom viewed as divine. Purists who refuse to take advantage of the increase efficiency and accuracy of technology argue human

Referees should not be opposed to the use of technology and flagrant replay. While it may reverse some of their calls, plenty understand they are human and human perception is a flawed means of officiating in any activity. However, referees stuff in their fears of being replaced by technology that technology is not a replacement for them or a means of humiliation. Instead, it is a means of enhancing their position and bringing additional input into decisions when a call is seriously questioned for its accuracy. Instant replay in the long run will actually help referees gain much credibility because it will enable them to have a to a greater extent accurate track record of calls, even if some of those calls were only accurate after instant replay review.

Referees use of instant replay also demonstrates that they recognize their own human fallibility and their cooperation in officiating with the greatest degree of accuracy sort of of block efforts to achieve such a level. More importantly, the use of instant replay technology will help reduce the number of inaccurate calls that often have such an impact on a team that they prevent them from achieving their true position in the league at year's end. Anyone who does not think the use of instant replay technology achieves this greater degree of fairness does not remember the situation of the Jets, Redskins, Dolphins and Lions last year, "Replay would make the NFL a different league?and a better one. If replay had been in effect last season, the Jets and Redskins probably would have made the playoffs instead of the Dolphins and Lions. In the final week the postseason of those four teams were decided by an erroneous ruling that Lions cornerback Bryant Westbrook had intercepted a fourth-quarter pass in the end zone. If the correct call had been made, the Jets would have had three more downs to act to win or tie the score from the Detroit 9. Instead, the Lions took over and held onto their 13-10 work" (Pompei 1).

Pom
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.