Air Polution Policy

The policies in the United States intentional to protect areas such(prenominal) as Prince William Sound in Alaska from maltreat by oil spills is one illustration of an attempt at environmental justification. Protection of the environment in such a context, however, does not soak up a direct relationship to the headspringness of human beings (so long as petroleum contaminated ocean life is not consumed). Thus, policy initiatives designed to protect the innate environment where direct relationships to human health are not strong are not included within the model of environmental health.

Laws designed to insure the purity of ground wet provide another example of environmental protection. In this instance, however, the come to to human health is stronger. Polluted pissing supplies are a direct threat to human health. Thus, environmental protection measures such as those designed to assure the purity of ground water are encompassed within the concept of environmental health, and such policies straightaway affect the use of chlorine and chlorine byproducts in industrial processes. The development and initiation of policies and actions dealing with environmental health are heavily influenced by political and economic considerations, as well as by concerns for human health and environmental protection. In fact, actions by the Reagan Administration in the United States during the 1980s present that political and economic concerns often have a greater influence than do factors associated with hum

industrial pollution is a major cause of haze in the air (Corfidi, 1993, p. 12). Because haze accompanies the high humidity of eastern summers, the line of work often is dismissed as a fact of life. murk in the contemporary period, however, is mostly a product of pollution. In some areas, the effect of haze cut the annual union of solar energy reaching the surface of the Earth by eight-percent. The type of haze that hangs over the eastern United States and Canada has been conjugated to acute respiratory ailments in humans. The chemicals contained in haze fall upon the tissues lining the nose, throat, and lungs.

Ohio's solid and hazardous waste program has veritable the longest and most aggressive venomous enforcement emphasis (Coval, 1991, p. ER23).

In this program all criminal colzas are felonies. The reckless violation of statutes, regulations and orders of the Ohio EPA director relating to the storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid, hazardous and infectious wastes constitutes criminal conduct. Each day of violation of the regulatory requirements constitutes a classify offense, which subjects the multi-day violator to significant cumulative sentences.

The application of Ohio environmental protection enforcement policies are analyzed within the context of cases involving enforcement action by the Ohio EPA. The primary case analyzed is the Waste Technologies Industries case. Other cases, however, also are analyzed.

In April 1992 West Virginia Attorney General Mario Palumbo, citing violations of federal official laws, sued to revoke the permits for the due east Liverpool incinerator (Noah, 1993, p. A5). The next month Senator Howard Metzenbaum of Ohio introduced legislation that would have prohibited the burning hazardous waste at the East Liverpool incinerator until all legal and administrative appeals had been resolved. At this point, a vocalization of to group that owns Waste Technologies Industries sought assistance from Vice death chair Dan Qu
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.